Skip to content
Quod Ubique The Common Confession of the Universal Church

Layer 2 · 18

The Communion of Saints as Real Solidarity

The Common Witness

The historic church has consistently witnessed that the communion of saints (communio sanctorum) is not merely a figure of speech for the fellowship of living believers but a confession of real, active solidarity between the Church on earth and the Church in heaven. The baptized dead are not absent from the Body of Christ; they remain members of it. The bond forged by the Holy Spirit in baptism is not severed by death — it endures, and with it endures a genuine mutuality between the living and the departed. This conviction undergirds the universal practice of praying for the dead, commemorating the martyrs, observing the liturgical calendar of saints’ days, and — in the traditions that affirm it — seeking the intercession of those who have died in Christ. Layer 1 confesses the creedal article “the communion of saints.” Layer 2 develops its implications: that this communion is active, not passive; that the living and the dead are joined in a solidarity that is more than memory.

Scriptural Warrant

  • “Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us” (Hebrews 12:1 ESV) — the departed saints are not absent spectators but a present reality that the earthly church is surrounded by
  • “But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, and to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect” (Hebrews 12:22–24 ESV) — the earthly church’s worship is joined to the heavenly assembly; the “spirits of the righteous made perfect” are present, not remote
  • “And when he had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each holding a harp, and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints” (Revelation 5:8 ESV) — the heavenly elders hold and present the prayers of the saints, implying an active role of the departed in the liturgical life of the whole Church
  • “For I am sure that neither death nor life… will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 8:38–39 ESV) — if death cannot sever the believer from Christ, neither can it sever the believer from the Body of Christ; the dead in Christ remain in communion with the living in Christ
  • “For none of us lives to himself, and none of us dies to himself. For if we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord. So then, whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord’s” (Romans 14:7–8 ESV) — the living and the dead alike belong to the Lord, and therefore to each other
  • “He is not God of the dead, but of the living, for all live to him” (Luke 20:38 ESV) — the patriarchs are alive to God; Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are not annihilated but living members of the divine economy

Patristic and Historical Attestation

Cyprian of Carthage (c. 200–258)

Cyprian’s De Unitate Ecclesiae grounds the Church’s unity in the one baptism and one Spirit that binds all members — living and departed — into a single body. The martyrs who have gone before are not separated from the Church but are its most honored members, whose dies natalis (birthday into heaven) is commemorated annually at the Eucharist celebrated over their tombs. — De Unitate Ecclesiae 4–6; Letters 12.2 [∗]

Augustine of Hippo (354–430)

Augustine devoted an entire treatise to the question of the Church’s care for the dead, affirming that prayers and the eucharistic sacrifice offered on behalf of the departed are beneficial to them — not as a matter of magical efficacy but as an expression of the Church’s unbroken communion in Christ. “The prayer of the Church, or of certain pious individuals, is heard on behalf of certain of the dead.” — De Cura pro Mortuis Gerenda, c. 421

John Chrysostom (c. 349–407)

Chrysostom explicitly teaches the solidarity of the living and dead in Christ: “Let us not hesitate to help those who have departed and to offer our prayers for them… It is possible to find some solace for the departed. Let us not then be weary in aiding the dead, bringing them alms and oblations.” He also witnesses to the universal practice of commemorating the martyrs and seeking their prayers. — Homilies on Philippians 3.4 [∗]; Homilies on 1 Corinthians 41.5 [∗]

Ephrem the Syrian (c. 306–373)

Ephrem’s hymns and homilies bear witness to the communion of saints in the Syriac tradition. He addresses the martyrs as living intercessors and speaks of the departed as members of the one Body who continue to participate in the Church’s prayer. The Syriac liturgical tradition, like the Greek and Latin, commemorates the saints at the Eucharist and offers prayers for the faithful departed — evidence that the practice was not a Western or Greek innovation but was held across the full geographic range of the early Church. — Hymns on Paradise 8 [∗]; Nisibene Hymns 37 [∗]

The Catacomb Evidence (2nd–4th centuries)

The inscriptions in the Roman catacombs provide the earliest material evidence of the communion of saints as lived practice. Graffiti at the tombs of Peter and Paul include petitions for the prayers of the apostles: Petre et Paule, petite pro nobis (“Peter and Paul, pray for us”). Funerary inscriptions request prayers for the dead and invoke the dead as intercessors. The Abercius inscription (c. 180), one of the earliest Christian epitaphs, asks passers-by to pray for the deceased — presupposing that the living and the dead remain in mutual communion. This is not theological speculation but the devotional instinct of the earliest Christian communities, expressed in stone.

Tradition-Formulary Evidence

Roman Catholic

The communion of saints is dogma, developed through centuries of conciliar and magisterial teaching. The Council of Trent (Session XXV, 1563) affirmed the invocation of saints, prayer for the dead, and the value of indulgences as expressions of the communion between the Church Militant (on earth), the Church Suffering (in purgatory), and the Church Triumphant (in heaven). The Second Vatican Council (Lumen Gentium 49–51) reaffirmed: “The union of the wayfarers with the brethren who sleep in the peace of Christ is in no way interrupted… the Church has always believed that the apostles and Christ’s martyrs… are closely united with us in Christ.”

Eastern Orthodox

The solidarity of living and departed is fundamental to Orthodox piety. The liturgy includes regular commemoration of the dead (mnemosynon), and the Church prays for the departed at every Divine Liturgy. The saints are invoked as intercessors — the Theotokos supremely, but also the apostles, martyrs, and all the righteous. The Orthodox reject purgatory as a distinct doctrine but affirm that the prayers of the living benefit the departed and that the departed intercede for the living. The liturgical calendar of saints is not decorative but constitutive of the Church’s life.

Lutheran

The Augsburg Confession (Article XXI) affirms that “the saints are to be remembered so that we may strengthen our faith when we see how they experienced grace and how they were helped by faith.” However, it rejects the invocation of saints as intercessors: “Scripture does not teach us to call upon the saints or to seek their help.” Lutheranism thus affirms the communion of saints in principle — including the conviction that the dead in Christ are alive and honored — while rejecting the active implications of intercession and invocation. Prayer for the dead was retained by some early Lutherans but gradually abandoned.

Reformed

The Reformed tradition confesses “the communion of saints” in the Apostles’ Creed but generally limits its meaning to the fellowship of living believers. The Westminster Confession (XXVI.1) defines it as the union of the elect with Christ and “communion in each other’s gifts and graces.” It explicitly rejects prayer for the dead and the invocation of saints. Calvin acknowledged that the departed are in Christ but denied that this entails any communication or mutual aid between the living and the dead: the departed rest in Christ and have no ministry toward the earthly church.

Anglican

Classical Anglicanism occupies a mediating position. The Book of Common Prayer (1549) included prayers for the dead; the 1552 revision removed them; the 1662 prayer for the Church Militant includes the petition “that we, with all those who are departed in the true faith of thy holy Name, may have our perfect consummation and bliss.” Article XXII condemns “the Romish doctrine concerning… invocation of saints” but does not define what “the Romish doctrine” is — leaving space for Anglo-Catholics to practice invocation while Evangelicals reject it. The liturgical calendar of saints is retained in all Anglican prayer books.

The Dissenting Minority

Who dissents: Those who limit “the communion of saints” to the living church on earth, rejecting prayer for the dead, the invocation of saints, and any active solidarity between the earthly and heavenly Church. This includes much of Reformed, Baptist, Free Church, and Evangelical Protestantism.

When: The Reformation, though with antecedents in Vigilantius (c. 400), whom Jerome refuted with characteristic ferocity.

The strongest case for dissent:

  1. The sufficiency of Christ’s mediation. “There is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5 ESV). To seek the intercession of departed saints is to interpose mediators between the believer and Christ — a practical denial of the sufficiency of his priestly work.

  2. The prohibition of necromancy. “There shall not be found among you anyone who… inquires of the dead” (Deuteronomy 18:10–12 ESV). Communication with the departed is forbidden by divine law. While defenders distinguish between necromantic conjuration and the communion of saints in prayer, the dissenter argues that the distinction is less clear in practice than in theory.

  3. The silence of Scripture. The New Testament nowhere commands prayer to the departed or prayer for them. The passages cited (Hebrews 12, Revelation 5) describe the heavenly reality but do not instruct believers to address the departed or to seek their aid. The practice rests on inference and tradition, not on apostolic instruction.

  4. Simplicity of devotion. The proliferation of saints’ cults, relics, patron saints for every conceivable need, and elaborate hierarchies of heavenly intercessors has historically obscured the simplicity of direct access to God through Christ. The Reformation’s instinct to clear away intermediaries and direct the believer straight to the throne of grace is pastorally wise, even if theologically one-sided.

  5. The rest of the dead. The departed are with Christ and at rest (Philippians 1:23; Revelation 14:13). To involve them in earthly affairs — even piously — may be to disturb a rest that God has granted them.

These concerns are not trivial, and the history of popular devotion to the saints has frequently validated them. But the dissenting position must reckon with the fact that the practice of commemorating the martyrs and praying for the dead is attested from the earliest archaeological and literary evidence — it is not a medieval corruption but a primitive instinct of the Christian community, older than the canon of the New Testament itself.

For Further Study

  1. Augustine, On the Care to Be Had for the Dead (c. 421) — the classic patristic treatment
  2. J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines (5th ed., 1977), ch. 17 — the communion of saints in patristic thought
  3. Jaroslav Pelikan, The Christian Tradition, vol. 1: The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (1971), ch. 4 — historical development
  4. Philip Schaff, The Creeds of Christendom, vol. 1 (1877) — confessional treatments of the communion of saints across traditions
  5. Ratzinger (Benedict XVI), Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life (1988), ch. 7 — modern Catholic theological development